ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Efficiency evaluation of phospholipid fatty acid method based on lipid standards: methanol failed to recover a majority of phospholipids yet eluted unexpected glycolipid.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) method has been popular and powerful for characterizing soil microbial communities over decades. However, little is known about efficiencies of acidic vs. alkaline extractants and catalysts in PLFA extraction and methylation. More urgently, it remains unclear whether methanol could efficiently elute phospholipids while avoiding recovering non-target lipids. Here, by adding pure lipid standards representative of major neutral, glyco-, and phospholipids into acidic and alkaline soils collected from subtropical China, we comprehensively evaluated efficiencies of extraction, elution, and methylation of three steps in the PLFA method. A good proportion of PLFAs could be extracted by phosphate buffer with both acidic (42-51%) and alkaline (43-68%) soils while citrate buffer worked better for acidic (43-46%) than alkaline (36-47%) soils. Phospholipids were expected to be mainly eluted in methanol, yet we found a non-negligible proportion of phospholipids eluted by chloroform for both acidic (36-71%) and alkaline (9-55%) soils, which is much larger than previously reported. Only 42-50% (acidic soils) and 45-68% (alkaline soils) of phospholipids were recovered in methanol. Meanwhile, 16% (acidic soils) and 5% (alkaline soils) of glycolipid DGDG were unexpectedly eluted into methanol. The alkaline catalyst (mean 86% across all investigated phospholipids) was more efficient in facilitating phospholipids methylation than the acidic one (mean 67%). Overall, incomplete separation among lipid types caused loss of phospholipids and introduction of glycolipid interferences in the methanol fraction, leading to biased estimation of soil microbial biomass and composition. Chloroform elution of phospholipids challenges the principle of "like dissolves like" in solid-phase chromatography, although we cannot rule out the uncertainty caused by background PLFAs and future experiments are needed to provide more evidence. To effectively remove lipid interferences and efficiently elute phospholipids, possible solutions include replacing chloroform with hexane, increasing elution volumes of acetone and methanol, and/or using anion exchange columns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.