Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438156›Full record

ReviewDesigned monomers and polymers2025

The future of herbicide application: controlled-release formulations for enhanced agricultural sustainability.

Vijeta Luhach, Jyoti Yadav, Poonam Barala, Parul Sangwan, Shashi Suhag, Vinita Hooda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Designed monomers and polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vijeta LuhachDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Life Sciences, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India.
Jyoti YadavDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Life Sciences, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India.
Poonam BaralaDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Life Sciences, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India.
Parul SangwanDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Life Sciences, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India.
Shashi SuhagDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Life Sciences, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India.
Vinita HoodaDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Life Sciences, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The agricultural sector faces significant challenges from weed-induced crop losses, driving increased herbicide use and associated environmental and health risks. Controlled-release formulations (CRFs) of herbicides offer a promising solution by employing advanced materials such as synthetic and natural polymers, clay minerals, siliceous materials, and nanoparticles to optimize the release and efficacy of active ingredients (AIs). This review explores the mechanisms of controlled release - desorption, diffusion, osmosis, and matrix dissolution - and examines the role of carrier properties in modulating AI release kinetics. Advances in smart nanocarriers and encapsulation technologies demonstrate improved precision, reduced herbicide usage, and minimal impact on soil microbiomes, fostering sustainable agriculture. Despite these innovations, challenges remain in standardizing processes, enhancing cost-effectiveness, and scaling up field applications. This study emphasizes the critical balance between improving agricultural productivity and minimizing ecological harm, highlighting the potential of CRFs to revolutionize weed management practices while preserving soil health and ecosystem integrity.

Indexed as

active ingredientbiodegradable polymersclay mineralscontrolled releaseNanoformulationsustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID40438156
PMCPMC12117858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.