Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438122›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience of consciousness2025

Meditation and complexity: a review and synthesis of evidence.

Daniel A Atad, Pedro A M Mediano, Fernando E Rosas, Aviva Berkovich-Ohana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The entropic brain today.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Illuminating consciousness.Frontiers in psychology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Using Electroencephalography to Advance Mindfulness Science: A Survey of Emerging Methods and Approaches.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel A AtadEdmond Safra Brain Research Center, Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa 3103301, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9301-2065
Pedro A M MedianoDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, 180 Queen's Gate, South Kensington, London SW7 2RH, United Kingdom.
Fernando E RosasSussex AI and Centre for Consciousness Science, Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN19RH, London, United Kingdom.
Aviva Berkovich-OhanaEdmond Safra Brain Research Center, Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa 3103301, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have seen growing interest in the use of metrics inspired by complexity science for the study of consciousness. Work in this field has shown remarkable results in discerning conscious from unconscious states, and in characterizing states of altered conscious experience following psychedelic intake as involving enhanced complexity. Here, we study the relationship between complexity and a different kind of altered state of consciousness: meditation. We provide a scoping review of the growing literature studying the complexity of neural activity in meditation, disentangling different families of measures, short-term (state) from long-term (trait) effects, and meditation styles. Beyond families of measures used, our review uncovers a convergence toward identifying higher complexity during the meditative state when compared to waking rest or mind-wandering and decreased baseline complexity as a trait following regular meditation practice. In doing so, this review contributes to guide current debates and provides a framework for understanding the complexity of neural activity in meditation, while suggesting practical guidelines for future research.

Indexed as

complexityconsciousnessentropyfractal dimensionliterature reviewmeditationneuroimagingpredictive processing

Identifiers

PMID40438122
PMCPMC12118461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.