ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Determining the Range for Appropriate Gestational Weight Gain Proportion for Singleton Pregnant Chinese Women.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To examine the optimal proportion of gestational weight gain (GWG) for Chinese singleton women based on Chinese body mass index (BMI) categories. A retrospective cohort study with 16,977 singleton pregnant women was conducted. Among the included subjects, 2/3 of whom were randomly imported into the training set for calculating the optimal proportion of GWG ranges, and another third of the women were imported into the validation set to evaluate the GWG ranges calculated with different methods. The detection rate of adverse outcomes of pregnant women with appropriate weight gain proportion under the above three methods was evaluated by paired chi-square test, using the data of pregnant women in the validation database. According to the percentile method, the suitable proportion of GWG of pregnant women with underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obesity before pregnancy was 25.8%-37.8%, 20.3%-30.8%, 13.0%-23.1%, respectively. According to the Odds ratio method, the suitable proportion of GWG for pregnant women with different BMI categories was 24%-34%, 14%-18%, and 4%-14%, respectively. According to the combined risk curve method, the suitable proportion of GWG for pregnant women with different BMI categories was 27.9%-32.5%, 11.5%-16.8%, and -2.1%-5.5%, respectively. When the proportion of GWG ranges from 27.9%-32.5%, 11.5%-16.8%, and -2.1%-5.5% for different BMI categories, the pregnant women with appropriate weight gain proportions have the lowest detection rate of adverse maternal and infant outcomes. The GWG proportion serves as a valuable clinical indicator for enabling personalized weight management strategies and tailored nutritional guidance during pregnancy. The recommended proportion of GWG in this study for underweight, normal, overweight, and obese pregnant women was 27.9%-32.5%, 11.5%-16.8%, and -2.1%-5.5%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.