Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438080›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Individual and joint effects of exposure to phthalates and the risk of cardiovascular disease in the chronic kidney disease population: NHANES 2005-2018.

Yuehong Liang, Xiurong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuehong LiangDepartment of Nephrology, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Xiurong LiDepartment of Nephrology, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of studies on the relationship between urinary phthalate metabolites (UPMs) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence in adults suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD). We intended to examine the relationship between UPMs and the prevalence of CVD in people with CKD. Methods: The research utilized data in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2018. We employed three statistical models-a generalized linear regression model, a weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression model, and a Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) model. Results: We included 834 CKD participants finally. In the generalized linear regression model, the prevalence of CVD was higher in individuals with MiBP (OR 1.86; 95% CI 1.08-3.18; P for trend = 0.022), MCNP (OR 1.85; 95% CI 1.18-2.91; P for trend = 0.011), MBP (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.02-2.76; P for trend = 0.041) and MECPP (OR 2.22; 95% CI 1.28-3.86; P for trend = 0.008) in the highest tertile compared to those in the lowest tertile. In the WQS model, the WQS index was significantly positively associated with CVD (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.04-1.99; Conclusion: The results indicated that phthalate exposure was linked to an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease and highlighted the need to reduce plastic use among the CKD population.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesEnvironmental ExposurePhthalic AcidsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdultAgedBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPrevalenceRisk Factorsphthalic acidPhthalic Acidscardiovascular diseasechronic kidney diseasecross-sectional studyNHANESphthalates

Identifiers

PMID40438080
PMCPMC12116607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.