Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438064›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

How risk communication affects public trust in government: the moderating role of policy expectations.

Nuoxue Li, Weixi Zeng, Susu Yin, Lixia Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nuoxue LiUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
Weixi ZengUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
Susu YinUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
Lixia ZhaoUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Conspiracy narratives are a prevalent narrative framework in risk communication, often provoking public fear and defensive reactions, challenging the healthy interaction between governments and the public in social governance. Method: Through two survey experiments, this study explores the effects of conspiracy narratives on public trust in government and the moderating role of policy expectations. Results: In Study 1 ( Discussion: The study reveals the influence mechanism of conspiracy narratives on government trust, offering both a theoretical basis and practical recommendations for effective government communication and the development of harmonious government-public relations.

Indexed as

CommunicationFood, Genetically ModifiedGovernmentPublic OpinionTrustAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesconspiracy narrativesgovernment trustpolicy expectationsrisk communicationrisk perception

Identifiers

PMID40438064
PMCPMC12116495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.