Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438058›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2025

Cellular defense mechanisms against asbestos fibers.

Christy A Barlow, Brooke T Mossman

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christy A BarlowAetia Scientific Collaborative, Boulder, CO, United States.
Brooke T MossmanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although inhalation of sufficient doses and dimensions of airborne asbestos dusts in an occupational setting can produce cancer in the lungs, pleura and peritoneum, tumors occur in <5-10% of exposed individuals, even among persons with considerable historical exposures. In this perspective, we review cell defense mechanisms that are involved in protective and adaptive responses to asbestos exposure. These adaptive responses are orchestrated through a multifaceted cellular program involving the concerted action of diverse stress response pathways, including antioxidant responses, DNA repair mechanisms, molecular mechanisms for intracellular signaling leading to proliferation, apoptosis, and inflammation, and cell cycle regulation. These cell defenses suggest that humans can adjust to moderate levels of stress or change without experiencing negative effects, implying the existence of a threshold dose. Likewise, reported no-observed adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) for various asbestos fiber types and asbestos-related cancers in experimental and epidemiological data further support the existence of a threshold dose and are discussed here.

Indexed as

AsbestosOccupational ExposureApoptosisHumansOxidative StressAsbestosasbestoselongated mineral fibers (EMPs)lung cancermesotheliomathreshold

Identifiers

PMID40438058
PMCPMC12116596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.