ArticleScience progress
Development of a simplified and scalable hydrogel-based method for 3D cell culture.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo develop a cost-effective and mechanically robust 3D collagen hydrogel system suitable for pressure-based culture, enabling physiologically relevant in vitro modeling of mechanical stress responses in cells.MethodsA rat tail type I collagen-based hydrogel was formulated through optimized component ratios and cast into standard 24-well plates to form uniform gel columns. Endothelial cells was embedded and subjected to 30 mmHg pressure culture for up to 48 h. Gel morphology and fiber architecture were assessed via scanning electron microscopy. Cell viability, proliferation (Ki67 immunostaining), and tube formation ability were evaluated. A custom mechanical compression setup was used to apply and monitor sustained pressure.ResultsThe hydrogel exhibited stable gelation, uniform porosity, and resistance to deformation under mechanical loading. SEM confirmed a consistent nanofiber network, with fiber diameter unaffected by 30 mmHg pressure. After 24-h pressure culture, the gel retained its height and structure. Endothelial cells remained viable but showed reduced proliferation and impaired tube formation under pressure, as indicated by Ki67 staining and angiogenesis assays.ConclusionsThis 3D collagen hydrogel provides a simple, cost-effective, and scalable alternative to complex bioprinting methods, supporting broader application of 3D cell culture in biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.