Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437919›Full record

ArticleActa cardiologica2025

International survey of cardiac device clinic staff determining patient-perceived challenges with remote monitoring.

Bert Vandenberk, Neal Ferrick, Elaine Y Wan, Sanjiv M Narayan, Aileen M Ferrick, Satish R Raj

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta cardiologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bert VandenberkDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8296-920X
Neal FerrickDepartment of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Elaine Y WanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Sanjiv M NarayanCardiology Division, Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Aileen M FerrickCardiac Electrophysiology, White Plains Hospital, White Plains, NY, USA.
Satish R RajDepartment of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Autonomic Dysfunction Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Machine Learning for Ventricular ArrhythmiasR01HL162260 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Sanjiv M Narayan · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL162260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegular interaction with patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) provides CIED clinic personnel with unique insights into patient-related barriers and challenges to remote monitoring (RM) implementation.

methodsUsing a global network, an international survey was administered to CIED clinic personnel. Qualitative questions gathered information on perceived challenges with patient connectivity and patient-level barriers associated with RM implementation.

resultsA total of 339 responses from 302 unique centres were included in the analysis. Respondents most often were cardiac electrophysiologists (57.8%), followed by nurses (17.1%) and nurse practitioners (7.7%). Most respondents (84.7%) reported at least one challenge in daily RM management. The biggest challenge was the increasing data volume and data variability (38.3%), followed by staff shortage (33.8%), difficulties with billing for technical activities (20.2%), and insufficient RM reimbursement (16.0%). Patient connectivity was identified as a major barrier by 72.7% of respondents. The main concerns were patient literacy (80.8%), followed by a lack of patient understanding of RM importance (65.8%), the lack of required bandwidth or technology to support RM (49.6%), and the cost to the patient (47.9%). Subgroup analyses showed that patient connectivity was often identified as a major barrier by non-MD CIED clinic staff, respondents working in office-based CIED clinics, and respondents from clinics with a per-patient payment reimbursement model.

conclusionsThere are many patient-related barriers identified by non-MD CIED clinic staff. Dedicated strategies to optimise the utilisation and adherence of RM of patients with CIEDs are urgently needed to improve clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantablePacemaker, ArtificialFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairescardiac implantable electronic devicesdevice clinicRemote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40437919
PMCPMC13110432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.