Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437874›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational medicine2025

Responsiveness of different MET tumour alterations to type I and type II MET inhibitors.

Yonina R Murciano-Goroff, Valentina Foglizzo, Jason Chang, Natasha Rekhtman, Ann Elizabeth Sisk, Jamie Gibson, Lia Judka, Kristen Clemens, Paola Roa, Shaza Sayed Ahmed and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Yonina R Murciano-GoroffDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Valentina FoglizzoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Jason ChangDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Natasha RekhtmanDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ann Elizabeth SiskDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jamie GibsonDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Lia JudkaDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Kristen ClemensDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Paola RoaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Shaza Sayed AhmedDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Nicole V BremerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Courtney Lynn BinacoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Sherifah Kemigisha MuzunguDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Estelamari RodriguezSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida, USA.
Madeline MerrillDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Erica SgroeDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Matteo RepettoDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Zsofia K StadlerDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Michael F BergerCenter for Molecular Oncology, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York, USA.
Helena A YuDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Eneda ToskaDepartment of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Srinivasaraghavan KannanBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Chandra S VermaBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Alexander DrilonDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Emiliano CoccoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1397-2656

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
American Cancer Society and SCCC ACSP-2024-02Dwoskin Family FoundationLung Cancer Research FoundationMadelon Ravlin Grant MemorialNCI/NIH P30-CA240139NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIHNIH HHSNonna's Garden fundSylvester Comprehensive Cancer CenterTumor biology intra-programmatic pilot award from the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer CenterWoman's Cancer Association of the University of Miami ACSP-2024-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMutations in c-MET receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) can be primary oncogenic drivers of multiple tumour types or can be acquired as mechanisms of resistance to therapy. MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are classified as type I or type II inhibitors, with the former binding to the DFG-in, active conformation of MET, and the latter to the DFG-out, inactive conformation of MET. Understanding how the different classes of MET TKIs impact tumours with varied MET alterations is critical to optimising treatment for patients with MET altered cancers. Here, we characterise MET mutations identified in patients' tumours and assess responsiveness to type I and II TKIs.

methodsWe used structural modelling, in vitro kinase and in cell-based assays to assess the response of MET mutations to type I and II TKIs. We then translated our pre-clinical findings and treated patients with MET mutant tumours with selected inhibitors.

resultsWe detected the emergence of four (three previously uncharacterised and one known) MET resistance mutations (MET

conclusionsComprehensive characterisation of the sensitivity of mutations to different TKI classes in oncogenic kinases may guide clinical intervention and overcome resistance to targeted therapies in selected cases. KEY POINTS: Kinase mutations in RTKs are primary or secondary drivers in multiple cancer types Some of these mutations confer resistance to type I but not to type II inhibitors in preclinical samples and in patients The biochemical characterization of mutations in oncogenic kinases based on their sensitivity to type I and type II inhibitors is crucial to inform clinical intervention.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metAnilidesDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansMutationPyridinesAnilidescabozantinibMET protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metPyridinesMETresistance to targeted therapytype I and type II TKIs

Identifiers

PMID40437874
PMCPMC12120261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.