ArticleThe Annals of pharmacotherapy2026
Association of Direct Oral Anticoagulant-Proton Pump Inhibitor Co-Therapy with Adverse Outcomes: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Article in The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Efficacy of Rebamipide, Pantoprazole, and Their Combination for Gastroprotection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants: The Randomized REGATA Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Trial
- Proton Pump Inhibitor Co-prescription, Dabigatran Use, and Ischaemic Stroke or Transient Ischaemic Attack in Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based Case-Control Study.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Article
- Decoding the causes of ischemic stroke despite ongoing oral anticoagulation and their clinical impact: the ASPERA-R study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Clinical Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation During Anticoagulation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDirect-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are first-line therapy for atrial fibrillation and for venous thromboembolism prevention and treatment. In addition, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are recommended by the ACC Expert Consensus for patients receiving DOAC.
objectiveTo determine the risk of clinically important thromboembolic and bleeding events and death in patients concomitantly prescribed DOACs and PPIs compared with DOAC alone.
methodsWe undertook a population-based cohort study of Ontario residents aged 66 years or older who were newly dispensed a DOAC from 2009 to 2020. The primary outcome was a composite of clinically relevant bleeding, thrombotic events, and all-cause death. We then used a time-dependent Cox regression model to estimate the adjusted hazard of outcomes during time periods where patients were exposed vs not exposed to PPI.
resultsWe included 283 771 new DOAC users (mean age 78.3 years, 49.4% female). The age/sex-standardized outcome event rate of the composite outcome was higher in the DOAC-PPI cohort [20.2 (95% CI 20.0-20.5) per 100 person-years] than in the DOAC-alone cohort [15.2 (95% CI 15.1-15.4) per 100 person-years]. In time-dependent Cox regression analyses examining time periods during DOAC-PPI co-therapy vs DOAC alone, risks were elevated for all outcomes during periods of PPI co-therapy, suggesting residual confounding. In a secondary analysis of patients receiving DOAC-PPI co-therapy (n = 115 493), periods of DOAC-PPI co-therapy were associated with a greater hazard for death (HR 2.24, 95% CI 2.14-2.35), but a lower risk for both thrombosis (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.96) and clinically relevant bleeding (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.76-0.81). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Our cohort study of older adults suggests that DOAC-PPI co-therapy is associated with decreased upper GI bleeding but increased mortality. Since the implications are major and may be due to residual confounding, we recommend that the findings be verified in randomized trials before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.