ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2025
Exploring Patient Mealtime Experience in an Acute Care Setting Using the Modified Austin Health Patient Mealtime Experience Tool.
Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Foodservice Models and Nutrition Practices in Spinal Facilities: Insights and Opportunities for Improvement From a Pilot Multinational Survey.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsMalnutrition is prevalent in Australian hospitals, affecting 30%-40% of inpatients. Enhancing patient mealtime experience is a recognised strategy to support improved dietary intake and clinical outcomes. Yet, there is little published data on mealtime experience in acute hospital settings in Australia. This study aims to capture patient mealtime experience in an acute care setting at a regional Australian hospital, using a modified version of the Austin Health Patient Mealtime Experience Tool.
methodsA cross-sectional study was undertaken across six acute care wards at Bendigo Health between July and September 2024. Patient mealtime experience was explored through interviewer-administered surveys, including 32 Likert scaling items and 6 open-ended responses. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data, whilst deductive thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data to describe mealtime experience.
resultsEighty-one patients participated in the study. Patients were most dissatisfied with food quality, particularly sensory characteristics and variety, in both the quantitative and qualitative results. Patients were most frequently satisfied with staff interactions (90% 'always' or 'often' positive), although the qualitative results highlighted insufficient mealtime care. The physical environment was generally highly rated, with a majority of patients (> 70%) reporting that noise, visitors, room surroundings and smells and odours 'rarely' or 'never' impacted food intake. The food ordering system was rated favourably, with 89% of participants rating meal timing as 'always' or 'often' positive and 73% rating meal accuracy as 'always' or 'often' satisfactory. However, qualitative results revealed usability issues related to the electronic meal ordering system. Finally, qualitative responses identified nutrition impact symptoms as a barrier to mealtime experience and intake.
conclusionFood quality, sufficient mealtime care, management of nutrition impact symptoms and improving usability of electronic ordering systems are areas highlighted for improvement in mealtime experience. Addressing these factors through targeted quality improvement initiatives can enhance mealtime satisfaction and support nutritional intake. Integrating patient perspectives into service planning is essential for fostering patient-centred hospital foodservices and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.