ArticleInternational wound journal2025
Skin Protection With Hydrofibre Foam and Silicone-Based Dressing Can Help Prevent Pressure Injuries: A Preliminary Evaluation in Brazil.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of silicone foam dressings in preventing pressure injuries in the sacral and heel areas of patients: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Moisture-Responsive Thermal Conductivity Properties of Hydrofiber Versus Polyurethane Foam: Implications for Pressure Injury Prevention.International wound journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding skin microclimate-the temperature and humidity at the interface between the skin and other surfaces-is critical for preventing pressure injury (PI). This prospective case series evaluated the performance of a hydrofibre multilayer foam dressing with silicone coating in managing the sacral microclimate in intensive care patients with intact skin at high PI risk when used with a standard PI prevention protocol. Sacral temperature and humidity were measured using a thermographic imaging camera and electrical bioimpedance device, respectively. These data were collected daily for a maximum of 7 consecutive days. Data of 25 patients were analysed. The mean sacral humidity during the first 4 days of dressing use was 20.7%. Its levels reduced on Days 5 and 6 and later returned to Day 2 levels on Day 7. The sacral temperature showed no sudden change with dressing use. Correlations between sacral microclimate and smoking, alcohol, systemic arterial hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were determined. There was no evidence of PI among the participants during the 7-day follow-up. The hydrofibre multilayered foam dressing with silicone coating effectively managed the sacral microclimate in high-risk intensive care patients, highlighting its potential utility in PI prevention protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.