Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437732›Full record

SynthesisJournal of applied toxicology : JAT2025

Do Gadolinium-Based Contrasts Represent a High Risk for Genotoxicity in Mammalian Cells? A Systematic Review.

Thiago Guedes Pinto, Rogerio Aparecido Dedivits, Daniel Araki Ribeiro

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of applied toxicology : JAT, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thiago Guedes PintoDepartment of Biosciences, Institute of Health and Society, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rogerio Aparecido DedivitsDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo (USP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel Araki RibeiroDepartment of Biosciences, Institute of Health and Society, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5057-4983

Funding

CAPES 001Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scientific rationale for this review stems from the increasing global use of gadolinium-based contrast agents in medical imaging and the concerns over the long-term environmental accumulation of gadolinium waste, which may pose biological risks. The primary objective was to determine whether gadolinium exposure induces genetic damage in mammalian cells, regardless of the assay method used, and to assess the quality of the studies available in the literature. Genotoxicity was measured through assays such as the micronucleus test, comet assay, chromosomal aberration, and sister chromatid exchange. A total of 17 studies were included being 11 studies (out of 17) with positive genotoxic effects, suggesting that gadolinium can induce DNA damage. Most of the studies (12 out of 17) were rated as "strong" or "moderate" in quality, providing reliable evidence for these findings. This review advances the current understanding of gadolinium's potential health risks by highlighting its genotoxic effects.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaDNA DamageGadoliniumMutagensAnimalsChromosome AberrationsComet AssayHumansMicronucleus TestsMutagenicity TestsRisk AssessmentSister Chromatid ExchangeContrast MediaGadoliniumMutagensDNA damagegadoliniumgenotoxicitymammalian cellsrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID40437732
PMCPMC12371810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.