ArticleThe Journal of heredity2025
A novel sex-associated genomic region in Catostomus fish species.
Article in The Journal of heredity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic regions that influence sex are hypothesized to play a key role in evolutionary diversification, as sex determination mechanisms may promote or impede reproductive isolation between closely related species. Remarkably, these mechanisms are almost completely unknown in many taxa, especially in clades like fish with extremely variable sex determination. In Catostomus fishes, contemporary hybridization is extensive but variable, and factors influencing hybridization dynamics are not fully understood. We used genotyping-by-sequencing data from three Catostomus species (bluehead, white, and flannelmouth suckers) to identify regions of the genome associated with sex using a genome-wide association study. We identified a genomic region in bluehead suckers from Colorado on chromosome 4 that significantly associates with sex and is suggestive of a sex-determining region. This region is not significant in the other species studied here, or in a divergent lineage of bluehead suckers, implying that either the sex-determining region of the genome differs in these species and populations, or that technical limitations precluded identification of sex determination. These results provide the first description of sex determination systems in Catostomus species and suggest that further investigation of sex determination in the Catostomidae genus is needed to better characterize evolutionary turnover of sex determination in this species-rich group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.