Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437646›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychology2025

Global prevalence of imposter syndrome in health service providers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nader Salari, Seyed Hamidreza Hashemian, Amin Hosseinian-Far, Amirreza Fallahi, Pegah Heidarian, Shabnam Rasoulpoor, Masoud Mohammadi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Time to Address Eating Disorder Risk Among Medical Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impostor Syndrome: A Back Seat Driver.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  11. Gender-based disparities in self-reported procedural experience: a cross-sectional survey of medical students in Poland.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nader SalariDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Seyed Hamidreza HashemianStudent Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Amin Hosseinian-FarDepartment of Business Analytics & Systems, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9EU, UK.
Amirreza FallahiStudent Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Pegah HeidarianStudent Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Shabnam RasoulpoorDepartment of Nursing, Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Masoud MohammadiResearch Center for Social Determinants of Health, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran. Masoud.mohammadi1989@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImposterism, also known as imposter syndrome or imposter phenomenon, is an emerging phenomenon that has attracted much attention in recent years. Given that this phenomenon is common among high-achieving individuals and its identification often overlaps with symptoms of anxiety, depression, stress, and burnout, the aim of this study is to determine the global prevalence of imposter syndrome and its associated factors.

methodsFor this study, PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched, and all relevant studies were transferred to EndNote (v.8) and reviewed. Data analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (v.2) software; a random effects model was adopted for analysis, and the I

resultsIn a review of 30 studies with a sample size of 11,483 people, the prevalence of imposter syndrome was 62% (95% CI: 52.6-70.6) based on meta-analysis and the random effects method. In examining the factors affecting the heterogeneity of studies and the effect of sample size on this heterogeneity, it was found that with increasing sample size, the prevalence of imposter syndrome decreases (p < 0.05), and with increasing years of studies, the prevalence of imposter syndrome increases (p < 0.05). Additionally, in this study, self-esteem, anxiety, depression, stress, and burnout were identified as the most important factors associated with imposter syndrome.

conclusionGiven the relatively high prevalence of imposter syndrome, which is a serious psychological challenge and can negatively affect the mental health and performance of individuals, the results of this study provide useful information for designing appropriate policies and interventions to develop effective pertinent solutions.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelAnxiety DisordersBurnout, ProfessionalHumansPrevalenceSelf ConceptImposterImposter phenomenonImposter SyndromeMeta-analysisPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID40437646
PMCPMC12117965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.