Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437634›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Brain Injury and Ketamine study (BIKe): a prospective, randomized controlled double blind clinical trial to study the effects of ketamine on therapy intensity level and intracranial pressure in severe traumatic brain injury patients.

Veerle De Sloovere, Liese Mebis, Pieter Wouters, Fabian Guïza, Eva Boonen, Marc Bourgeois, Jasperina Dubois, Didier Ledoux, Piet Lormans, Hugues Maréchal and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05097261 (Brain Injury and Ketamine), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05097261 phase4recruitingnot on this map

Brain Injury and Ketamine: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double Blind Clinical Trial to Study the Effects of Ketamine on Sedative Sparing and Intracranial Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeert Meyfroidt, MD, PhDRan2021 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsBrain Injuries, TraumaticArmsKetamine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Veerle De SloovereDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Liese MebisLaboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Pieter WoutersLaboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Fabian GuïzaLaboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eva BoonenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Turnhout, Turnhout, AZ, Belgium.
Marc BourgeoisDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Brugge, AZ, Belgium.
Jasperina DuboisLaboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Didier LedouxDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Piet LormansDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
Hugues MaréchalDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, CHR La Citadelle Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Emmanuel Van der HauwaertDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, AZ Imelda, Bonheiden, Belgium.
Bart DepreitereDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Geert MeyfroidtLaboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. geert.meyfroidt@uzleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4259-3935

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Senior Clinicial Investigator Grant 1843123NPfizer Pfizer Grant 53234057Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, KU Leuven Clinical Council for ResearchUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, KU Leuven Education (KOOR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), sedatives are often used to control intracranial pressure (ICP), to reduce brain metabolism, to allow for other treatments such as mechanical ventilation or targeted temperature management, or to control paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity. Prolonged sedation is often necessary. The most commonly used sedatives in TBI are propofol and midazolam, often in combination, but both have significant side effects when used at high doses for several days. Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, provides sedation and analgesia with minimal respiratory depression or haemodynamic instability. However, ketamine carries a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) precaution regarding its use in patients with pre-anaesthetic elevated cerebrospinal fluid pressure, which discourages its use in TBI patients. Several observational studies and two large meta-analyses do not suggest that the use of ketamine as an induction agent or sedative in sedated and mechanically ventilated TBI patients would increase the ICP. Off-label use of ketamine for this indication is increasing worldwide. To date, no prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) has demonstrated the safety of ketamine in TBI patients.

methodsThe Brain Injury and Ketamine (BIKe) study is a prospective multicentre double-blind placebo-controlled RCT, to evaluate the safety, and effect on therapeutic intensity to reduce ICP, of ketamine as an adjunct to a standard sedation regimen in patients with severe TBI. Adult TBI patients, admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), requiring sedation and ICP monitoring within 72 h of admission, will be randomized to ketamine or placebo. The study drug will be started within 6 h of randomization. The dose of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) is 1 mg/kg/h, by continuous infusion. The IMP will be stopped when the last ICP control sedative is discontinued. Data collection will stop when the patient is discharged from the ICU. All patients will be followed for 6 months post-trauma. The study is powered for the safety endpoint of detecting a clinically relevant increase of two episodes in the median number of episodes of high intracranial pressure episodes per ICU stay. A total of 100 patients are required to meet these objectives. We hypothesize a clinically relevant reduction in the therapeutic intensity level (TIL) score of at least 3 points. DISCUSSION: This study is the first prospective RCT to investigate the safety of ketamine as an adjunct to a standard sedation regimen in TBI patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05097261. Registered on October 28, 2021.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticHypnotics and SedativesIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureKetamineAdultDouble-Blind MethodHumansProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeHypnotics and SedativesKetamineAnalgesicsBrain injuryCentral nervous systemCranio-cerebral traumaKetamineTraumatic wounds

Identifiers

PMID40437634
PMCPMC12121202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.