ArticleGenome biology2025
The impact of PCR duplication on RNAseq data generated using NovaSeq 6000, NovaSeq X, AVITI, and G4 sequencers.
Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moving from a taxonomic to a functional perspective in global microbiome analysis requires optimizing multiplexing ratios.mSystems · 2026Article
- Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies RNF24 as a critical host factor for foot-and-mouth disease virus entry.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Preliminary Exploration on Melatonin-Mediated Protective Effects in Intracranial Aneurysms: Transcriptomic, Proteomic, and Metabolomic Profiling of Cerebral Vascular Tissues Combined with in vivo Animal Experiments.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- RoCK and ROI: single-cell transcriptomics with multiplexed enrichment of selected transcripts and region-specific sequencing.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Reference-free RNA profiling predicts triple negative breast cancer chemoresistance to neoadjuvant treatment.NAR cancer · 2025Article
- Genetic variants in diminished ovarian reserve and premature ovarian insufficiency: implications for assisted reproductive outcomes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Flexible, production-scale, human whole genome sequencing on a benchtop sequencer.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- The impact of PCR duplication on RNAseq data generated using NovaSeq 6000, NovaSeq X, AVITI, and G4 sequencers.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTranscriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) is a powerful technology for gene expression profiling. Selection of optimal parameters for cDNA library generation is crucial for acquisition of high-quality data. In this study, we investigate the impact of the amount of RNA and the number of PCR cycles used for sample amplification on the rate of PCR duplication and, in consequence, on the RNA-seq data quality.
resultsFor broader applicability, we sequenced the data on four short-read sequencing platforms: Illumina NovaSeq 6000, Illumina NovaSeq X, Element Biosciences AVITI, and Singular Genomics G4. The native Illumina libraries were converted for sequencing on AVITI and G4 to assess the effect of library conversion, containing additional PCR cycles. We find that the rate of PCR duplicates depends on the combined effect of RNA input material and the number of PCR cycles used for amplification. For input amounts lower than 125 ng, 34-96% of reads were discarded via deduplication with the percentage increasing with lower input amount and decreasing with increasing PCR cycles. The reduced read diversity for low input amounts leads to fewer genes detected and increased noise in expression counts.
conclusionsData generated with each of the four sequencing platforms presents similar associations between starting material amount and the number of PCR cycles on PCR duplicates, a similar number of detected genes, and comparable gene expression profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.