Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437608›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025

Deep learning radiomics fusion model to predict visceral pleural invasion of clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.

Jiabi Zhao, Tingting Wang, Bin Wang, Bhuva Maheshkumar Satishkumar, Lumin Ding, Xiwen Sun, Caizhong Chen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiabi Zhao *Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No.180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Tingting Wang *Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No.180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Bin Wang *Department of Radiology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200021, China.
Bhuva Maheshkumar SatishkumarDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No.507 Zhengmin Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Lumin DingDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Pudong New Area Mental Health Center, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200124, China.
Xiwen Sun *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No.507 Zhengmin Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China. sunxiwen5256@163.com.
Caizhong Chen *Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No.180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China. chen_caizhong1967@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China National Natural Science Foundation of Chinathe Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 21Y11910400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the predictive performance, risk stratification capabilities, and auxiliary diagnostic utility of radiomics, deep learning, and fusion models in identifying visceral pleural invasion (VPI) in lung adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 449 patients (female:male, 263:186; 59.8 ± 10.5 years) diagnosed with clinical IA stage lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) from two distinct hospitals were enrolled in the study and divided into a training cohort (n = 289) and an external test cohort (n = 160). The fusion models were constructed from the feature level and the decision level respectively. A comprehensive analysis was conducted to assess the prediction ability and prognostic value of radiomics, deep learning, and fusion models. The diagnostic performance of radiologists of varying seniority with and without the assistance of the optimal model was compared.

resultsThe late fusion model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.812) compared to clinical (AUC = 0.650), radiomics (AUC = 0.710), deep learning (AUC = 0.770), and the early fusion models (AUC = 0.586) in the external test cohort. The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the VPI status predicted by the late fusion model were independently associated with patient disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.044). Furthermore, model assistance significantly improved radiologist performance, particularly for junior radiologists; the AUC increased by 0.133 (p < 0.001) reaching levels comparable to the senior radiologist without model assistance (AUC: 0.745 vs. 0.730, p = 0.790).

conclusionsThe proposed decision-level (late fusion) model significantly reducing the risk of overfitting and demonstrating excellent robustness in multicenter external validation, which can predict VPI status in LAC, aid in prognostic stratification, and assist radiologists in achieving higher diagnostic performance.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungDeep LearningLung NeoplasmsPleuraTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesAdenocarcinoma of lungCTDeep learningRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID40437608
PMCPMC12121141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.