ArticleMalaria journal2025
Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum parasites with pfhrp2 exon 2 gene deletion in symptomatic malaria patients across Ghana in 2021.
Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2-based rapid diagnostic tests (PfHRP2-based RDTs) are the most widely used malaria RDTs across Africa. The emergence and spread of pfhrp2 gene-deleted parasites have prompted nationwide surveillance to monitor trends and potential hotspots for P. falciparum with pfhrp2 gene deletions. This study evaluated the prevalence and distribution of P. falciparum with pfhrp2 gene deletions in Ghana in 2021.
methodsThis cross-sectional study utilized the First Response
resultsThe overall malaria positivity for the two RDTs was similar: 72.3% (95% CI: 71.4-73.2) for the First Response RDT and 71.5% (95% CI: 70.6-72.4) for the HRP2/panLDH Combo kit (p = 0.215). There were no pfhrp2 exon 2 gene deletions resulting from a false negative RDT, however, deletions were identified in 0.3% (19/5,611) of samples that tested positive for both the First Response RDT and the panLDH band of the Combo kit, and 9.1% (2/22) of the missed infections, leading to an overall pfhrp2 exon 2 gene deletion of 0.4% (21/5,633) in the population.
conclusionNo false negative sample was identified in this study, and less than 1% of parasites with pfhrp2 gene deletions (mainly from RDT positive samples) were found in the population . This finding offers assurance for the continued reliance on HRP2-based RDTs for malaria screening in public health clinics in Ghana. Nonetheless, continued surveillance is needed to determine the expansion of P. falciparum with these gene deletions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.