ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
E-Health rehabilitation on clinical, quality of life, and functional capacity in cardiovascular disease: preliminary results.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the preliminary effects of an e-health-based rehabilitation program delivered by a new technological solution, named eHeart, on functional capacity domains by assessing pre- and post-effects on cardiorespiratory fitness, quality of life, strength, and flexibility. The nine initial patients enrolled in this preliminary study were predominantly male (57%), elderly, with CVD, 4 of whom were diagnosed as HF, mostly with I and II NYHA functional class, and arterial hypertension (100%). Among the standard physical assessment domains changes pre and post-remote rehabilitation utilizing the eHeart technological platform, we observed a substantial increase in the cardiorespiratory capacity after rehabilitation in the number of 6MST steps (89 ± 47 versus 129 ± 48, p = 0.002), with a high D Cohen value (41.2) along with a substantial reduction on the resting rate (HR, bpm) (69 ± 10 versus 63 ± 10 bpm, p = 0.003) with a D Cohen of 25.4. Other variables (HR peak, SBP rest and peak, DBP rest and peak) did not present a significant difference following the remote protocol (p < 0.05). We observed a significant improvement after the rehabilitation in the isometric muscle strength of elbow flexion (13 ± 5 versus 18 ± 7, p = 0.04, D Cohen of 6.14) and in quality of life by the EQ-5D-5 L (0.57 ± 0.26 versus 0.71 ± 0.17, p = 0.04, D Cohen of 0.16). The conclusion of our study highlights the significant benefits of e-health in improving functional capacity, quality of life, and isometric muscle strength in individuals with CVD. Through 14 sessions, we observed marked improvements in these key health indicators, suggesting that e-health can be a valuable tool in the management of various health conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.