ArticleBMC oral health2025
Rural Pakistan's smokeless tobacco epidemic: a need for tailored interventions.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral cancer is a leading cause of death in Pakistan, with a significant burden among rural populations. The primary risk factor for oral cancer in this region is the widespread use of smokeless tobacco (SLT). Despite international efforts to reduce tobacco consumption, SLT use remains prevalent. This study aimed to explore the experiences of a rural population with SLT use.
methodsThis qualitative study employed an exploratory, phenomenological approach in Gadap Town, a rural area near Karachi, to investigate how local socioeconomic realities and cultural norms influence SLT use. The interview transcripts of 28 SLT users (75% men, 25% women), purposively sampled, were included in the final analysis. Transcripts were thematically analysed after verbatim transcription and translation.
resultsFour major themes emerged: (1) Dynamics of addiction, including peer influence, familial patterns, and stress-related coping; (2) Risk perception, spanning awareness of oral cancer risk yet persistent usage; (3) Cessation journey, highlighting withdrawal challenges, emotional dependency, and limited professional support; and (4) Socioeconomic factors, notably the economic burden on households and calls for stricter regulation. Although participants recognized health hazards, they found cessation difficult due to emotional reliance and minimal external assistance. Socioeconomic factors, including the increased availability of unregulated, untaxed SLT products and limited free access to cessation support, were identified as critical influences. Participants emphasized the potential role of strict regulatory measures and relevant interventions in supporting cessation.
conclusionThis study highlights a critical disconnect between participants' awareness of the harmful effects of SLT and their actual behaviour in attempting cessation. Despite being aware of the health risks, such as oral cancer, participants often continued SLT use due to emotional dependency and socioeconomic factors. Interventions that focus on culturally relevant cessation strategies, stress and financial management, and strict regulatory enforcement are essential to bridge this gap to support behavioural change. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.