ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025
Usage and effectiveness of strategies to sit less and move more: evaluation of the BeUpstanding™ national implementation trial.
Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAddressing prolonged workplace sitting is an identified priority. A national implementation trial of BeUpstanding™ - an online workplace intervention supporting teams of desk-based workers to sit less and move more - successfully reduced worker sitting time in a large sample of workers. However, it is unclear which strategies workers used to sit less and move more, how usage changed following intervention, and how this related to changes in work activity and sitting.
methodsBeUpstanding collected data from staff before and after the 8-week champion-delivered intervention regarding self-reported work behaviours (percentage of worktime sitting and moving; percentage sitting in prolonged bouts) and the usage (0 = never to 4 = always/nearly always) of 21 sit less/move more strategies (13 emphasised 'move more'). Strategy usage during versus before intervention were compared via linear mixed models. Strategy usage (0-4) and changes (-4-4) were tested in relation to post-intervention behaviours and behaviour changes using linear mixed models. Interaction tests and conditional inference trees compared strategies in their effectiveness.
resultsAcross 1614 staff (43.1 ± 11.3 years; 66% female) from 66 workplaces, the number of strategies used at least sometimes averaged 9.56 (SE = 0.19) pre-intervention. Strategy usage increased significantly (p < 0.05) in the number of strategies used (2.45 [95% CI: 2.18, 2.73], p < 0.001), mean strategy usage (0.37 [0.33, 0.41], p < 0.001), move-more strategy usage, and for every strategy except active travel. Every strategy was used by > 10% of staff following intervention. Strategy usage and changes were significantly associated with all behaviours and behaviour changes (all p < 0.01). There were significant differences in the strength of these associations between strategies (p < 0.05) and for move-more strategies versus other strategies (p < 0.05); however, no strategies were statistically counterproductive. Conditional inference trees identified various combinations of strategies whose usage predicted outcomes.
conclusionsAll strategies showed acceptability (used by > 10%), most were modifiable (increased with intervention), and, to varying degrees, their usage was associated with work behaviours. Findings suggest all 21 strategies are suitable for Australian desk-based workers to select based on personal and contextual fit. Strategies most strongly linked with all behaviours or targeted behaviours (i.e., increasing movement) might be emphasised to enhance effectiveness.
trial registrationACTRN12617000682347. The trial was prospectively registered on the 12th May, 2017 (ACTRN12617000682347) before the soft launch online and last updated on the 11th June 2019, before the national implementation trial recruitment commenced (12th June, 2019).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.