ArticleBMC medical education2025
Datawiz-IN: fostering representative innovation in health data science-outcomes from a summer research experience.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) across sectors highlights the importance of diverse perspectives in guiding its development and implementation. This study examines"Datawiz-IN" an educational initiative that provides data science and machine learning research experience to students from various backgrounds in biomedicine. Supported by a National Institutes of Health R25 grant from the National Library of Medicine, the program engaged cohorts of 14 students in Summer 2023 and 13 students in Summer 2024. Initial data suggest modest increases in representation, with higher participation rates of women and less prevalant students compared to typical AI research programs. Student projects addressed various aspects of biomedical data science, including disease mechanism analysis, clinical decision support systems, and health disparity investigations. While the program's limited scale and short duration constrain broad generalizations, preliminary results indicate the potential benefits of structured inclusion efforts in expanding participation in AI research and development. This case study contributes to ongoing discussions about approaches for developing more representative AI systems and research communities, though longer-term studies will be needed to assess sustained impact. The findings suggest that targeted educational initiatives may play a role in broadening participation in AI development, while acknowledging that meaningful change requires sustained, systemic efforts across multiple institutions and career stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.