Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437497›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Do irrigation solutions effect bond strength of composite resin to deep margin elevation material? An in-vitro study.

Şeref Nur Mutlu, Yasemin Derya Fidancıoğlu, Hatice Büyüközer Özkan, Hayriye Esra Ülker

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Şeref Nur MutluHealth Vocational School, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, 42200, Turkey. serefnurmutlu@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9556-3495
Yasemin Derya FidancıoğluHealth Vocational School, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, 42200, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0260-6458
Hatice Büyüközer ÖzkanDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Alanya, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4419-1518
Hayriye Esra ÜlkerDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2967-5680

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe deep margin elevation (DME) technique provides advantages for root canal treatment, but the impact of applied irrigation protocols on bonding for subsequent restorations is a significant concern. The aim of this in vitro study was to test the bond strength of a flowable resin material used in DME restorations after composite restorations were exposed to different irrigation protocols.

methodsStandard composite samples (G-aenial

resultsGroups A1 and A2, immersed in NaOCl for 30 min, showed statistically significantly lower bond strength compared to Group B3, immersed in ClO₂ for 30 min, and the control group (P < 0.05). The use of ClO₂ irrigation is recommended due to its positive effects on bond strength.

conclusionProlonged NaOCl irrigation may adversely affect the bond strength of flowable composites used for deep margin elevation.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsDental BondingDental MaterialsRoot Canal IrrigantsChlorine CompoundsDental Restoration, PermanentDental Stress AnalysisEdetic AcidHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingOxidesSodium HypochloriteStress, MechanicalSurface PropertiesTime FactorsChlorine Compoundschlorine dioxideComposite ResinsDental MaterialsEdetic AcidOxidesRoot Canal IrrigantsSodium HypochloriteWaterDeep margin elevationFlowable compositeIrrigation solutionMicro-tensile bond strength

Identifiers

PMID40437497
PMCPMC12121251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.