ArticleBMC oral health2025
Biomechanics of different thread designs of dental implants assisting unilateral free end mandibular partial dentures.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental implants assisting unilateral free end mandibular partial dentures (RPDs) improve their performance and prognosis, however, no consensus exists on the type of thread used in these implants. The current work studied the effect of dental implant thread design on stress distribution around dental implants assisting unilateral free end RPDs using strain gauges and finite element analysis to select the best performing thread design.
methodsTwenty-four custom made titanium-aluminum-vanadium (Ti-6Al-4 V) implants were designed and milled 4 thread designs; V-shaped, buttress, reverse-buttress and trapezoid, and were inserted in the approximate locations of tooth number 36 in 6 polymethyl methacrylate Class II Kennedy models, which had teeth number 36, 37, and 38 missing, and unilateral removable partial dentures were constructed to fit each model, with a metal housings and O-rings in their fitting surface attaching to the ball abutment. Surface strains were measured with strain gauges, and mean stresses around the implants, and principal abutments in each tested model were compared using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The finite element analysis, recorded stresses, around each dental implant thread design, in the form of colorcoded maps using Von Mises stress analysis.
resultsThe recorded micro-strains around V-shaped threads and their related abutments were higher than those recorded around the buttress threads and their related abutments, reverse buttress threads and their related abutments, and trapezoid threads and their related abutments in descending order as determined by one‑way ANOVA (F = 284.489, p < 0.001), and Tukey post hoc pairwise comparison (p < 0.001). FEA results presented the stresses generated around each thread design, under vertical load, the highest stress concentration values were observed around V-shaped threads, followed by the buttress threads, the reverse buttress threads, and finally the least stresses were observed around the trapezoid threads. Under oblique load, more stresses were observed than those under vertical load, being also greatest around V-shaped threads, then decreasing around buttress, reverse buttress, and trapezoid threads.
conclusionsThe strain gauge and finite element analysis revealed that the trapezoid threads demonstrated least stress concentration at the bone implant interface, followed by the reverse buttress, buttress, and finally the V-shaped threads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.