ArticleBMC oral health2025
Effect of osteotomy strategy on primary stability and intraosseous temperature rise: an ex-vivo study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thermal and Stability Outcomes of Different Osteotomy Techniques and Implant Macrogeometries in Type IV Bone: An In Vitro Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary stability is a perquisite for achieving successful osseointegration. Additionally thermal effect of implant bed preparation plays an important role in success of a dental implant. This ex vivo study was conducted to compare one step implant specific osteotomy and conventional osteotomy in terms of primary stability and thermal changes during surgery.
methodsForty eight implants were inserted into the sheep iliac crest bones each with a safe distance to each other and divided into six groups. In two of the groups implant specific osteotomy and in the remaining 4 groups conventional osteotomy was performed. In the groups, the primary stability of the trioval implants designed for the implant specific osteotomy were compared with the oval active threaded implants. The two osteotomy methods were also compared. Additionally the thermal changes during the two osteotomy methods were compared using a double-channel temperature monitoring device.
resultsStatistically significant differences (P <.05) were observed between the stability groups and the thermal evaluation groups (P <.05). Implant specific osteotomy revealed significantly higher stability than the conventional osteotomy (P <.001). Osteotomy without irrigation caused significantly higher thermal changes than the conventional osteotomy wit irrigation (P <.001).
conclusionAlthough the implant specific osteotomy reveals better primary stability, it causes higher temperature during drilling. However, since this increase is within the limits and doesn't cause a risk in terms of osseointegration, it may be used safely in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.