Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437457›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Development and validation of the oral management self-efficacy scale (OMSES): a cross-sectional psychometric study in adult patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Wanying Su, Xiaowen Feng, Anqi Cai, Wei Xiao, Fang Shen, Cuiyin Peng, Ziwen Ye, Xiaolv Zhong

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wanying SuDepartment of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0633-1222
Xiaowen FengDepartment of Nursing, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6684-8834
Anqi CaiDepartment of Nursing, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei XiaoDepartment of Nursing, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 2012690440@gzhmu.edu.cn.
Fang ShenDepartment of Nursing, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Cuiyin PengDepartment of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ziwen YeDepartment of Nursing, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3331-9301
Xiaolv ZhongDepartment of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

Nursing Cultivation Research Fund Project of the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University HL202201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a Self-Efficacy Scale for Oral Management for adult patients with fixed orthodontic appliances and to test its reliability and validity.

methodsGuided by self-efficacy theory, the initial version of the scale was formed through literature review and expert consultations. A convenience sample of 502 adult patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment was surveyed. Item analysis was conducted to refine the scale, and its validity was assessed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest reliability.

resultsThe scale developed in this study comprises four dimensions: supportive behavior, oral care, dietary restrictions, and positive attitude, with a total of 28 items. The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.92, indicating excellent internal consistency. The test-retest reliability was 0.92, suggesting that the scale is a stable and reliable instrument for assessing oral health self-efficacy in orthodontic patients. The scale also demonstrated good content and construct validity.

conclusionThe scale developed in this study demonstrates good reliability and validity and can be used to assess the oral management self-efficacy levels for adult patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Indexed as

Orthodontic Appliances, FixedSelf EfficacyAdolescentAdultAttitude to HealthCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOral HealthOral HygienePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdult orthodonticsFixed orthodontic appliancesPsychometric validationScale developmentSelf efficacy

Identifiers

PMID40437457
PMCPMC12117949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.