Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Evaluating women's experiences and satisfaction with labour induction in India: a comparison of the participant generated experience and satisfaction (PaGES) index with standard methods.
Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03749902 (A Randomized Trial Comparing Oral Misoprostol Alone with Oral Misoprostol Followed by Oxytocin in Women Induced for Hypertension of Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Trial Comparing Oral Misoprostol Alone with Oral Misoprostol Followed by Oxytocin in Women Induced for Hypertension of Pregnancy
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough induction of labour is becoming more common worldwide, there are few studies that assess women's satisfaction with it. The newly developed Participant Generated Experience and Satisfaction (PaGES) Index collects brief qualitative data and quantifies it, allowing detailed satisfaction data to be collected on large populations. The PaGES data has never previously been compared to other methods of assessing study participants' satisfaction. We aimed to triangulate PaGES Index, Likert questionnaire and interview data from a large, randomised trial of labour induction to fully understand women's priorities, experience and satisfaction and to compare the findings of the three instruments.
methodsA convergent parallel multi-methods research design was used. Participants in the Misoprostol or Oxytocin for Labour Induction (MOLI) trial (n = 520) completed the PaGES Index before and after birth, listing priorities and allocating spending points to demonstrate their relative importance. Postpartum, participants scored their satisfaction with each item. Quantitative data was collected following birth on the acceptability of augmentation, delivery time, pain and anxiety using a Likert scale. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted, and thematic analysis was carried out using a framework approach. The data from 20 participants who had completed all three outcome measures were integrated and compared.
resultsAlthough common themes, such as pain, emerged from participants' responses to the three instruments, each provided different insights. The Likert responses demonstrated overall satisfaction with the induction process but with high levels of pain and anxiety. Semi-structured interviews highlighted that safety and health of the baby was a key priority. The PaGES Index confirmed that the baby's wellbeing was most important to women, but women also expressed a strong preference for vaginal delivery.
conclusionsThe PaGES Index, Likert questionnaire and semi-structured interview data provide varied but complimentary insights on women's birth experiences and their satisfaction with their induction process. The outputs of the three methods align, but the PaGES index was unique in capturing both detailed qualitative and quantitative information for all study participants.
trial registrationThe MOLI study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03749902, Registration date: 21st Nov 2018) and Clinical Trial Registry, India (CTRI/2019/04/018827).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.