Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437429›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Cadaver Anatomy Soft Skills Scale (CASSS): Design and preliminary validation of a tool to assess student perceptions of the impact of cadaveric anatomy instruction on soft skills for future healthcare workers.

Camryn J Pierce, Amanda R Howard, Katelynn M Corder

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Camryn J PierceCollege of Arts and Sciences, Samford University, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8442-5447
Amanda R HowardCollege of Arts and Sciences, Samford University, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5787-4161
Katelynn M CorderCollege of Arts and Sciences, Samford University, Birmingham, AL, USA. kcorder@samford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8086-5925

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As technology becomes more advanced, the effectiveness and appropriateness of cadaver dissections has been called into question. In addition to academic effectiveness, cadaver dissection can lead to both positive and negative emotional responses, potentially affecting so-called "soft skills" associated with effective healthcare professionals. In particular, we are interested in the perceived effect of cadaveric dissection on empathy, confidence, and professional boundaries in students who have completed cadaveric dissection-based gross anatomy courses. In this study, we validate a new tool to assess these perceived effects using survey data from graduate students who have completed a graduate level gross anatomy course. This instrument was validated by evaluating convergent and divergent validity of the CASSS established through Pearson's product moment correlations by correlating obtained factors with self-perceived general empathy, confidence, mortality, and professional boundaries scores. This tool will be useful for determining the impact that various anatomical education techniques have on the development of soft skills (empathy, confidence, and professional boundaries) associated with successful healthcare workers.

Indexed as

AnatomyDissectionHealth PersonnelStudents, MedicalAdultCadaverClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementEmpathyFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnatomyCadaver dissectionEmotional response

Identifiers

PMID40437429
PMCPMC12121177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.