ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Anticoagulation therapy and related outcomes among Asian patients after bioprosthetic valve replacement.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceAn inadequate number of studies focused on Asian populations have investigated the safety of warfarin usage among Asian patients with tissue valve aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR).
objectiveThis study aimed to identify the optimal international normalized ratio (INR) range for Asian patients during a 1-year follow-up after tissue valve replacement. DESIGN, SETTING,
participantsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent tissue valve AVR, MVR, and double valve replacement (DVR) between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2018. Data were sourced from the Chang Gung Research Database, an electronic structured medical database covering 4 regional hospitals and 3 medical centers. The exposure of interest was INR level. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The outcomes of primary and secondary interest were composite thromboembolic events and bleeding events during the 1-year follow-up, respectively. The relationship between INR level and the risk of thromboembolic events was explored using a logistic regression model in which the INR value was treated as a flexible restricted cubic spline. Because having atrial fibrillation (AF) greatly would greatly affect the INR control result, the analysis was stratified by AF status.
resultsA total of 1059 participants were eligible for this study. The mean patient age was 65.5 (11.9) years; 592 (55.9%) participants were men, and 467 (44.1%) were women. A total of 447 had AF and 612 did not. The lowest bleeding risk was observed at an INR level around 1.9 to 2.0. An INR level of 1.84 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.67) and 1.7 (HR, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.99) corresponded to the lowest risk of thromboembolic events in patients with pre-existing AF and those without, respectively. The INR level corresponding to the lowest risk of thromboembolic events was approximately 1.7 in patients without AF but with MVR, DVR, or isolated AVR. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: For patients who underwent tissue valve replacement, the bleeding risk was elevated when the INR was greater than 2.0, but the risk of thromboembolic event increased only when the INR was lower than 1.84 in the AF group and 1.7 in the non-AF group, regardless of whether the patient received AVR, MVR, or DVR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.