ReviewBMC genomics2025
Implementation of NGS and SNP microarrays in routine forensic practice: opportunities and barriers.
Review in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel 16-plex DIP-SNP panel for forensic analysis of imbalanced DNA mixtures in a Han Chinese population.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Individual identification and time since deposition estimation based on community structure and absolute abundance of the exposed vaginal microbiome.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Distant Kinship Inference and Forensic Genetic Genealogy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Beyond the Core: The Role of Supplementary Short Tandem Repeats in Forensic Genetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Recovery and analysis of ancient DNA: challenges, methods, and applications in forensic and archaeological science.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Reinvestigation of a paternity case with three CODIS core STR inconsistencies using MPS-based multi‑marker analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Beyond STRs: Integrative Forensic Genomics from MPS to Genetic Genealogy and AI-Based Prediction.Genes · 2026Review
- A Genomic Method for Combating Wildlife Trafficking: SNP-Based Traceability of Four Endangered Species in China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a STR and SNP multiplex detection system (88 STRs and 348 SNPs) using massively parallel sequencing.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Implications of uniparental disomy in forensic kinship testing: A case study of paternal isodisomy on chromosome 3.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
- Development of a Multiplex Amplification System Using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing for STRs and InDels.Human mutation · 2026Article
- Forensic utilization of NGS-STRs and evaluation of system efficacy for different kinship identifications.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Challenges in using massively parallel sequencing technology for forensic DNA analysis in Southeast Asia.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2025Article
- Review
- Genetic diversity and genotyping ofFrontiers in parasitology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forensic DNA analysis plays a pivotal role in personal identification, kinship assessment, and criminal investigations, with Short Tandem Repeat (STR) typing via capillary electrophoresis (CE) long established as the gold standard. However, CE-based STR analysis faces notable limitations in multiplexing capacity, the interpretation of degraded or mixed samples, and the resolution of complex kinship relationships. Emerging technologies such as Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) microarrays present promising alternatives that can address these shortcomings and expand the scope of forensic DNA testing. Despite their potential, the adoption of these methods in routine forensic practice remains limited due to high costs, technical complexity, and a lack of standardised protocols and legal frameworks. This review critically examines the capabilities, limitations, and current applications of NGS and SNP microarrays in comparison to traditional STR CE profiling. NGS enables STR sequencing and SNP typing with enhanced discriminatory power, better performance with degraded DNA, and improved mixture deconvolution. Conversely, SNP microarrays offer a cost-effective solution for extended kinship testing, Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG), and phenotypic prediction, though they are less effective with low-quality samples and DNA mixtures. Ethical, legal, and privacy concerns, particularly surrounding the use of Forensic DNA Phenotyping (FDP) and consumer genetic data in FIGG, further complicate their integration into forensic workflows. While significant challenges remain, technological advancements and growing regulatory efforts point towards an achievable path for wider implementation. A hybrid approach that combines STR CE for routine casework with NGS and SNP microarrays for complex scenarios, supported by investments in bioinformatics training, database expansion, and ethical governance, offers a practical strategy for integrating these technologies into future forensic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.