Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437376›Full record

ReviewBMC genomics2025

Implementation of NGS and SNP microarrays in routine forensic practice: opportunities and barriers.

Sharlize Pedroza Matute, Sasitaran Iyavoo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Genetic diversity and genotyping ofFrontiers in parasitology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sharlize Pedroza MatuteSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK.
Sasitaran IyavooSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK. siyavoo@lincoln.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic DNA analysis plays a pivotal role in personal identification, kinship assessment, and criminal investigations, with Short Tandem Repeat (STR) typing via capillary electrophoresis (CE) long established as the gold standard. However, CE-based STR analysis faces notable limitations in multiplexing capacity, the interpretation of degraded or mixed samples, and the resolution of complex kinship relationships. Emerging technologies such as Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) microarrays present promising alternatives that can address these shortcomings and expand the scope of forensic DNA testing. Despite their potential, the adoption of these methods in routine forensic practice remains limited due to high costs, technical complexity, and a lack of standardised protocols and legal frameworks. This review critically examines the capabilities, limitations, and current applications of NGS and SNP microarrays in comparison to traditional STR CE profiling. NGS enables STR sequencing and SNP typing with enhanced discriminatory power, better performance with degraded DNA, and improved mixture deconvolution. Conversely, SNP microarrays offer a cost-effective solution for extended kinship testing, Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG), and phenotypic prediction, though they are less effective with low-quality samples and DNA mixtures. Ethical, legal, and privacy concerns, particularly surrounding the use of Forensic DNA Phenotyping (FDP) and consumer genetic data in FIGG, further complicate their integration into forensic workflows. While significant challenges remain, technological advancements and growing regulatory efforts point towards an achievable path for wider implementation. A hybrid approach that combines STR CE for routine casework with NGS and SNP microarrays for complex scenarios, supported by investments in bioinformatics training, database expansion, and ethical governance, offers a practical strategy for integrating these technologies into future forensic practice.

Indexed as

Forensic GeneticsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA FingerprintingHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsDNA microarraysForensic DNA phenotyping (FDP)Forensic geneticsForensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG)Kinship testingMassively parallel sequencing (MPS)Next generation sequencing (NGS)Short tandem repeat (STR)Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)

Identifiers

PMID40437376
PMCPMC12117683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.