ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Navigating emotions, communication, and pain during prehospital labour: a mixed-methods survey with emergency ambulance services.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rebirth of the Meaning of Natural Childbirth: A Qualitative Study on the Perceived Impacts of Effective Midwife-Mother Communication among Iranian Midwives and Mothers.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite their crucial role in prehospital obstetric emergencies, there is little research exploring emergency medical service (EMS) personnel's perspectives and attitudes on out-of-hospital births, including balancing the numerous needs of the patient. Our aims were to (1) identify how EMS demographics and professional experience related to their confidence and comfort in treating a patient in labour and (2) explore EMS' perspectives on managing emotional needs and administering analgesia in a labour and birth setting in New Zealand (NZ).
methodsThis mixed-methods survey invited frontline clinical personnel from Hato Hone St John - the main EMS provider in NZ - to complete an online survey about unplanned out-of-hospital births. Self-reported confidence attending birth events and administering analgesia to women in labour was compared across participant demographic and professional characteristics. Qualitative content analysis was applied to free-text questions.
resultsOne hundred and forty-seven personnel completed the survey. Only 37% of respondents felt their training had equipped them to confidently manage births, with more experience with birth associated with higher confidence. Men and those who had not given birth were more comfortable providing analgesia to women in labour. Qualitative analysis identified four main categories: (1) Managing their own emotions, (2) Gender differences in views of unplanned births, (3) Managing interpersonal communication with women in labour, the family, and other health professionals, and (4) Views on pain management. The findings indicate that women in labour may be cared for differently depending on EMS clinicians' personal experiences, communication styles, and attitudes toward pain relief, highlighting the need for these providers to adapt their approach to meet the diverse needs of patients during these high-risk low frequency events.
conclusionEMS personnel navigate a range of emotions and high-risk factors related to their patient and the environment during unplanned pre-hospital births, which may adversely affect their temperament and interpersonal communication. A perception of unclear pain relief guidelines and limited available options can exacerbate challenges. In NZ and overseas, multi-disciplinary training with midwives and integrating maternity and newborn care into postgraduate and ongoing professional development could support EMS personnel to confidently manage these events and improve patient outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.