ArticlePharmaceutical research2025
Using Model Master Files to Support Oral Drug Product Development and Regulatory Submissions.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report summarizes the proceedings of Session 2 of the two-day public workshop titled "Considerations and Potential Regulatory Applications for a Model Master File" hosted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG) on May 2-3, 2024. The workshop aimed to discuss the frameworks and practical considerations for developing a model master file (MMF) and its applications to support drug product development and streamline regulatory review processes. This report provides a comprehensive and insightful overview of the second session of the workshop titled "MMF Applications for Oral Dosage Forms". The presentations, which included several case studies, covered potential frameworks and context of use (COU) of MMFs for oral drug products, practical considerations during model development, validation, and regulatory submission processes, as well as scientific justification for modification on approved MMFs. Additionally, the discussion highlighted the crucial role of global harmonization of MMFs, which can benefit both industry and regulatory authorities by making modeling more resource- and time-efficient while meeting high regulatory standards, ultimately reducing delays in drug development and accelerating the availability of new medicines. MMFs for oral dosage forms are especially advantageous due to the wealth of global resources from various organizations and the opportunity to extend these capabilities to complex generics. Lastly, the session also discussed the potential for using technology to track the lifecycle of accepted MMFs, enabling adaptations and ensuring transparency in their downstream reuse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40437347What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.