Observational studySpine deformity2025
Racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in healthcare for adult spinal deformity patients.
Observational study in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRacial and ethnic disparities in healthcare access remain underexplored among adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients in terms of cost related and non-cost related barriers to care.
methodsThis cross-sectional study analyzed healthcare access and utilization survey data from the National Institutes of Health's All of Us Research Program (May 6th, 2018-January 30th, 2025). The participants included adults aged ≥ 40 years with spinal deformity enrolled online or through partner organizations across the US. The cost and non-cost barriers to health among ASD patients by race and ethnicity were reported. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to analyze the relationship between race and ethnicity and experiencing barriers to care.
resultsThis study included 7272 ASD patients of which 5635 were White (74.5%) (median age, 69 years [IQR, 60.0-75.0]), 535 Hispanic (7.4%) (60.0 years [51.0-68.0]), 538 (7.4%) Black (61.5 years [52.0-69.0]) and 564 (7.8%) of other race and ethnicity (65.0 years [55.0-74.0]) of whom 528 (7.3%) proceeded to undergo correction surgery. Compared to White patients, Black patients had higher odds of reporting delayed general care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR, 2.5; 95% CI 1.7-3.8), follow-up care (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.3), and prescription filling (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-1.9) due to cost. Non-cost barriers for Black patients included lack of transportation aOR, 3.2; 95% CI 2.3-4.3) while Hispanic patients had higher odds of reporting delayed care due to childcare (aOR, 2.9; 95% CI 1.5-5.5) and care to an adult (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI 1.0-3.3) responsibilities. Black and Hispanic patients had higher odds of placing importance on having a provider with a similar background (aOR, 2.4; 95% CI 1.9-3.0; aOR, 3.1, 95% CI 2.4-3.9) and of never having had such a provider (aOR, 4.6; 95% CI 3.2-6.6; aOR, 3.1, 95% CI 2.4-3.9), respectively. They also had higher odds of reporting delayed care due to provider background differences (aOR, 1.9, 95% CI 1.4-2.4; aOR, 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2), respectively. Additionally, Hispanic patients had higher odds of reporting not being treated with respect by their provider (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI 1.0-2.5).
conclusionsRacial and ethnic disparities significantly impact ASD patients with Hispanic and Black patients facing higher rates of cost and non-cost barriers to care. The healthcare practitioners especially those specializing in ASD play a crucial role in recognizing and addressing these disparities to improve healthcare access and outcomes across racial and ethnic groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40437324What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.