Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437319›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2025

Investigating the relationship between media multitasking and executive function within a military population.

Scott Marriner, Julie Cantelon, Wade R Elmore, Seth Elkin-Frankston, Nathan Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Scott MarrinerUnited States Military Academy, West Point, NY, USA.
Julie CantelonUS Army DEVCOM Soldier Center, Natick, MA, USA.
Wade R ElmoreUS Army DEVCOM Soldier Center, Natick, MA, USA.
Seth Elkin-FrankstonTufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Nathan WardTufts University, Medford, MA, USA. nathan.ward@tufts.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8894-7087

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pervasive nature of media multitasking in the last fifteen years has sparked extensive research, revealing a nuanced but predominantly negative association with executive function. Given the cognitive demands and technological landscape of the modern battlefield, there is a critical interest in understanding how these findings may or may not extend to military members. To understand this relationship, we investigated the hypothesis that self-reported media multitasking behaviors would be negatively associated with performance-based measurements of executive function in a military population. Results found no significant relationship between overall media multitasking and any measures of executive function. However, average media multitaskers performed significantly better than heavy media multitaskers in a task-switching paradigm. Furthermore, we examined whether self-regulation moderated this relationship. Unlike previous research in non-military samples, we did not find that the impact of media multitasking on executive function was more pronounced among military members with lower self-regulation. By uncovering the nuanced interplay between these variables, this research contributes to a more thorough understanding of the cognitive implications of media multitasking both in general and within a military context.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionMilitary PersonnelMultitasking BehaviorSelf-ControlAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCognitive performanceExecutive functionMedia multitaskingSelf-regulation

Identifiers

PMID40437319
PMCPMC12119449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.