Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437311›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2025

Impaired reinforcement learning and coding of prediction errors in patients with cerebellar degeneration - a study with EEG and voxel-based morphometry.

Adam M Berlijn, Dana M Huvermann, Eric Bechler, Andreas Thieme, Alfons Schnitzler, Christian Bellebaum, Dagmar Timmann, Martina Minnerop, Jutta Peterburs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adam M BerlijnFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. berlijn@uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5217-5860
Dana M HuvermannFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Eric BechlerCore Facility for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Andreas ThiemeDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational and Behavioral Neurosciences (C-TNBS), Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Alfons SchnitzlerInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty & University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christian BellebaumFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Dagmar TimmannDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational and Behavioral Neurosciences (C-TNBS), Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Martina MinneropInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty & University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jutta PeterbursFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 437661157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated cerebellar involvement in reinforcement learning and prediction error (RL-PE) processing. Participants with pure cerebellar degeneration and demographically matched healthy controls performed a probabilistic feedback-based learning task while brain activity was recorded using electroencephalography (EEG). Structural magnetic resonance imaging was used to quantify cerebellar gray matter volume (GMV). Data from 21 cerebellar and 25 control participants were included in the analysis. We aimed to determine if feedback-based learning was impaired in patients relative to controls, and if single-trial RL-PEs were reflected in FRN, P3a, and P3b in the event-related potential (ERP) in patients and controls. Analysis of behavioral data revealed no differences in accuracy between patients and controls. Crucially, ERP analysis revealed that, while in controls, coding of RL-PEs was found in FRN and P3a for positive and in P3b for positive and negative feedback, these effects were absent in patients. Voxel-based morphometry revealed widely distributed cerebellar GMV reduction in patients, most pronounced in bilateral Crus I/ II and bilateral lobules I-IV. Multiple regressions in patients revealed a negative correlation between GMV in bilateral Crus I and II and FRN amplitudes. The present study extends previous evidence for cerebellar involvement in RL-PE processing in humans and advances our understanding of the cerebellum's role in performance monitoring and adaptive control of behavior.

Indexed as

CerebellumReinforcement, PsychologySpinocerebellar DegenerationsAdultAgedElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedAtaxiaCerebellumNeurodegenerationPerformance monitoringReinforcement learningReward prediction errors

Identifiers

PMID40437311
PMCPMC12356735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.