ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning based differential diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome and secondary bone tumors using whole body bone scintigraphy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A combined score based on anterior chest wall CT attenuation to aid recognition of SAPHO syndrome: a training-validation study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SAPHO syndrome is an inflammatory disorder with bone and cutaneous manifestations, for which whole-body bone scintigraphy (WBBS) is frequently used in diagnosis. The WBBS findings of SAPHO syndromes and secondary bone tumors (SBT) have overlapping features, posing diagnostic challenges. In this multicenter study, we aim to identify different bone and joint involvement patterns between the two disease entities through multiple methods to build machine-learning models and explore interpretable variables. The study included 1,193 patients, of which 593 were diagnosed with SAPHO syndrome and 600 with SBT. LASSO regression, logistic regression, and random forest techniques were applied in the training set to identify significant risk factors. Manual management and other methods were evaluated in the validation set to identify the top-performing model and the most interpretable terms. The study developed a model using 15 manually selected terms and multiple machine learning techniques, which demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in the G1 dataset for (training AUC 0.934, testing AUC 0.929, accuracy = 88.3%, precision = 88.7%, Recall = 88.3%, F1 score = 0.882). The model was compared with logistic regression and random forest models and showed consistent results in the G2 dataset for external validation (AUC 0.957, Youden index = 0.806, sensitivity = 0.820, specificity = 0.986). The pelvis, femur, and ribs (excluding anterior ribs 1st-5th) and thoracic vertebrae 1st-8th were significant predictors of SBT, whereas the sacroiliac joints, sternum, foot, anterior ribs 1st-5th, and clavicle were indicative of SAPHO. This study assesses the effectiveness of WBBS terms in identifying SBT from SAPHO syndrome and utilizes machine learning to help screen features for patients. The final model demonstrates its dependability, providing a valuable tool for accurate and timely diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.