Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437224›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Talk to your data: Introducing text embedding similarity analysis (TESA) in psychological research.

Juul Vossen, Evy Kuijpers, Joeri Hofmans

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Mapping relational mechanism clusters inFrontiers in psychology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juul VossenDepartment of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Evy KuijpersDepartment of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium. evy.kuijpers@vub.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4516-0860
Joeri HofmansDepartment of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While qualitative research plays a vital role in understanding complex phenomena, it lends itself poorly to testing formal hypotheses due to its inability to fit statistical models to text data. Approaches that are traditionally used to quantify text data (e.g., content analysis) are generally time-consuming, prone to researcher bias, and neglect a substantial amount of potentially important semantic context. Although novel approaches have been proposed, these typically require large amounts of text data and tend to be inductive in nature. To enable researchers to ask hypothesis-based and open-ended questions from one's text data, the current study proposes a novel retrieval augmented generation (RAG)-based approach (called text embedding similarity analysis, TESA) that transforms a hypothesis into two specific search terms: a population (or sample) and a variable of interest. Using pretrained large language models (LLM), we extract the semantic embedding of the search terms and text data and use cosine similarity to match search terms. This allows hypothesis testing by assessing the alignment between the distribution of similarity scores for a variable of interest with the expectation for the population.

Indexed as

PsychologyHumansQualitative ResearchSemanticsLarge language models (LLM)Qualitative researchRetrieval augmented generation (RAG)Text embedding similarity analysis (TESA)Textual data analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.