Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437218›Full record

ArticleNature methods2025

SAVANA: reliable analysis of somatic structural variants and copy number aberrations using long-read sequencing.

Hillary Elrick, Carolin M Sauer, Jose Espejo Valle-Inclan, Katherine Trevers, Melanie Tanguy, Sonia Zumalave, Solange De Noon, Francesc Muyas, Rita Cascão, Angela Afonso and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Applications and Challenges of Deep Learning in Human Genome Research].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A complete human pancreatic cancer genome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. cuteHap: Haplotype-Aware Structural Variant Detection in Phased Long-Read Sequencing Data.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Detecting Foldback Artifacts in Long-reads.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Hillary Elrick *European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6178-1670
Carolin M Sauer *European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2168-6630
Jose Espejo Valle-InclanEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4857-5984
Katherine TreversDepartment of Histopathology, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1254-9469
Melanie TanguyGenomics England, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4862-0981
Sonia ZumalaveEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2108-1861
Solange De NoonDepartment of Histopathology, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Francesc MuyasEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7857-0623
Rita CascãoInstituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Angela AfonsoInstituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Alistair G RustEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Fernanda AmaryDepartment of Histopathology, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Roberto TiraboscoDepartment of Histopathology, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Adam GiessGenomics England, London, UK.
Timothy FreemanGenomics England, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4497-681X
Alona SosinskyGenomics England, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-7409
Katherine PiculellDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
David T MillerDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1060-1945
Claudia C FariaInstituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Greg ElgarGenomics England, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7323-1596
Adrienne M FlanaganDepartment of Histopathology, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK. a.flanagan@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2832-1303
Isidro Cortes-CirianoEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. icortes@ebi.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2036-494X

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate detection of somatic structural variants (SVs) and somatic copy number aberrations (SCNAs) is critical to study the mutational processes underpinning cancer evolution. Here we describe SAVANA, an algorithm designed to detect somatic SVs and SCNAs at single-haplotype resolution and estimate tumor purity and ploidy using long-read sequencing data with or without a germline control sample. We also establish best practices for benchmarking SV detection algorithms across the entire genome in a data-driven manner using replication and read-backed phasing analysis. Through the analysis of matched Illumina and nanopore whole-genome sequencing data for 99 human tumor-normal pairs, we show that SAVANA has significantly higher sensitivity and 13- and 82-times-higher specificity than the second and third-best performing algorithms. Moreover, SVs reported by SAVANA are highly consistent with those detected using short-read sequencing. In summary, SAVANA enables the application of long-read sequencing to detect SVs and SCNAs reliably.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDNA Copy Number VariationsGenomic Structural VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNeoplasmsSequence Analysis, DNAGenome, HumanHumansWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40437218
PMCPMC12240814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.