ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Fully automated Bayesian analysis for quantifying the extent and distribution of pulmonary perfusion changes on CT pulmonary angiography in CTEPH.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical research on pulmonary hypertension from a 2025 perspective: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Automated attenuation analysis of CT pulmonary angiography identifies peripheral hyperperfusion as a prognostic marker in non-surgical chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Research advances in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: from pathological mechanisms to multidisciplinary management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Current Perspectives on Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis work aimed to develop an automated method for quantifying the distribution and severity of perfusion changes on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and to assess their associations with clinical parameters and expert annotations. MATERIALS AND
methodsFollowing automated segmentation of the chest, a machine-learning model assuming three distributions of attenuation in the pulmonary parenchyma (hyperemic, normal, and oligemic) was fitted to the attenuation histogram of CTPA images using Bayesian analysis. The proportion of each component, its spatial heterogeneity (entropy), and center-to-periphery distribution of the attenuation were calculated and correlated with the findings on CTPA semi-quantitatively evaluated by radiologists and with clinical function tests.
resultsCTPA scans from 52 patients (mean age, 65.2 ± 13.0 years; 27 men) diagnosed with CTEPH were analyzed. An inverse correlation was observed between the proportion of normal parenchyma and brain natriuretic propeptide (proBNP, ρ = -0.485, p = 0.001), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (ρ = -0.417, p = 0.002) and pulmonary vascular resistance (ρ = -0.556, p < 0.0001), mosaic attenuation (ρ = -0.527, p < 0.0001), perfusion centralization (ρ = -0.489, p = < 0.0001), and right ventricular diameter (ρ = -0.451, p = 0.001). The entropy of hyperemic parenchyma showed a positive correlation with the pulmonary wedge pressure (ρ = 0.402, p = 0.003). The slope of center-to-periphery attenuation distribution correlated with centralization (ρ = -0.477, p < 0.0001), and with proBNP (ρ = -0.463, p = 0.002).
conclusionThis study validates an automated system that leverages Bayesian analysis to quantify the severity and distribution of perfusion changes in CTPA. The results show the potential of this method to support clinical evaluations of CTEPH by providing reproducible and objective measures. KEY POINTS: Question This study introduces an automated method for quantifying the extent and spatial distribution of pulmonary perfusion abnormalities in CTEPH using variational Bayesian estimation. Findings Quantitative measures describing the extent, heterogeneity, and distribution of perfusion changes demonstrate strong correlations with key clinical hemodynamic indicators. Clinical relevance The automated quantification of perfusion changes aligns closely with radiologists' evaluations, delivering a standardized, reproducible measure with clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.