ArticleScientific reports2025
Head kinematic variability is minimal near preferred cadence and independent of the vestibular control of locomotion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vestibular contributions to balance control during stair negotiation versus walking and changes with aging.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The unstable nature of our bipedal posture requires continuous feedback to maintain internal estimates of self-motion and generate appropriate balance-correcting responses. This feedback control process involves the integration of multisensory information, including vestibular cues of head motion. Minimizing head motion variability may optimize the information transmitted by vestibular signals that are important for balance control and consequently drive vestibular contributions to locomotion which decrease as we move faster. In this study, participants walked outdoors at 40% to 140% of their preferred step cadence while we characterized head kinematic variability and vestibular-evoked balance responses to electrical vestibular stimulation, a common method to generate virtual signals of head movement. Head kinematic variability was lowest near participants' preferred step cadences (90-126 steps/min) and gait speeds (1.1-1.7 m/s) while vestibular-evoked responses decreased exponentially as step cadence and gait speed increased. Hence, the minima of head kinematic variability were close to preferred step cadences, near previously established minima for the metabolic cost of locomotion. The relationship between head kinematic variability and vestibular-evoked balance responses, however, was inconsistent across all step cadences, suggesting that head kinematic variability did not drive vestibular-evoked balance response magnitude. The observed reduction in the variability of head motion signals at the preferred locomotor cadence/speed may serve to improve our self-motion estimates and reduce information processing requirements to ensure effective navigation, thereby potentially contributing to the well-established minimum in metabolic cost near preferred cadence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.