ArticleScientific reports2025
An interpretable deep learning framework using FCT-SMOTE and BO-TabNet algorithms for reservoir water sensitivity damage prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for postoperative urinary retention after gynecologic abdominal-pelvic surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identification of water sources of mine water bursts based on the FPS-DT model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes an interpretable deep learning framework to address the high-dimensional and inherently unpredictable challenges associated with oil and gas drilling and completion operations. By comparing TabNet, Tab Transformer, Hopular, and TabDDPM through computational experiments under identical conditions, TabNet was selected as the optimal approach. The framework integrates Bayesian optimization (BO) with TabNet to model complex oilfield tabular datasets. Fair Cut Tree (FCT) and Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) are incorporated to mitigate data missingness and imbalance, thereby enhancing dataset integrity and robustness. Empirical validation was conducted using 270 data entries collected from 15 distinct oil fields, specifically focusing on reservoir water sensitivity damage in natural core samples. The proposed framework exhibited superior predictive accuracy for the water sensitivity index on an independent test set, achieving a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 4.4495% and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 4.05, underscoring its strong generalization capability. Moreover, this methodological approach enables a quantitative assessment of the influence of critical factors, including reservoir water salinity, initial permeability, and the mineralogical composition of rock formations, on water sensitivity predictions. This represents a significant advancement from traditional qualitative analyses to a more rigorous quantitative factor analysis, with the interpretability findings corroborating established mechanistic insights. The proposed framework offers a versatile and reliable solution for precise predictive modeling in complex drilling and completion scenarios reliant on tabular data, thereby providing a robust theoretical foundation and algorithmic support for accurate forecasting in the oil and gas industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.