ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Enhanced Pelvic CT Segmentation via Deep Learning: A Study on Loss Function Effects.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A prospective development and evaluation of a 2D convolutional neural network-based auto-segmentation model for cervical cancer radiotherapy.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Model Performance and Clinical Usefulness in Automated Rectal Segmentation in CT for Prostate and Cervical Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective radiotherapy planning requires precise delineation of organs at risk (OARs), but the traditional manual method is laborious and subject to variability. This study explores using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for automating OAR segmentation in pelvic CT images, focusing on the bladder, prostate, rectum, and femoral heads (FHs) as an efficient alternative to manual segmentation. Utilizing the Medical Open Network for AI (MONAI) framework, we implemented and compared U-Net, ResU-Net, SegResNet, and Attention U-Net models and explored different loss functions to enhance segmentation accuracy. Our study involved 240 patients for prostate segmentation and 220 patients for the other organs. The models' performance was evaluated using metrics such as the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard index (JI), and the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (95thHD), benchmarking the results against expert segmentation masks. SegResNet outperformed all models, achieving DSC values of 0.951 for the bladder, 0.829 for the prostate, 0.860 for the rectum, 0.979 for the left FH, and 0.985 for the right FH (p < 0.05 vs. U-Net and ResU-Net). Attention U-Net also excelled, particularly for bladder and rectum segmentation. Experiments with loss functions on SegResNet showed that Dice loss consistently delivered optimal or equivalent performance across OARs, while DiceCE slightly enhanced prostate segmentation (DSC = 0.845, p = 0.0138). These results indicate that advanced CNNs, especially SegResNet, paired with optimized loss functions, provide a reliable, efficient alternative to manual methods, promising improved precision in radiotherapy planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.