Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437137›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025

"They'll Talk About Everything Else… But Suicidal Ideation": Clinician Experiences Addressing Non-Disclosure of Suicidal Ideation Among Military-Affiliated Clients.

Melissa A Litschi, Steven L Lancaster, David J Linkh, Megan Lafferty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melissa A LitschiCohen Veterans Network, Institute for Quality, Stamford, CT, USA. melissa.litschi@cohenveteransnetwork.org.ORCID 0009-0006-4415-6930
Steven L LancasterCohen Veterans Network, Institute for Quality, Stamford, CT, USA.
David J LinkhCohen Veterans Network, Institute for Quality, Stamford, CT, USA.
Megan LaffertyCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

USAA 76152163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than half of people experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviors may never disclose their experiences to another person. Veterans are more likely to die by suicide than their civilian counterparts and report barriers to disclosure of suicidal thoughts and behaviors during screenings. While studies of veteran and service member perspectives offer recommendations to facilitate disclosure, little is known about clinician perspectives and strategies.

objectiveDescribe clinician perspectives on non-disclosure among military-affiliated clients and strategies to address potential non-disclosure in this at-risk population.

designQualitative analysis of transcript summaries from semi-structured interviews.

participantsSeventeen clinicians serving military and veteran clients participated. Professional backgrounds and credentials were diverse, with 71% having 5 or more years of clinical experience. Roughly half of the participants treated clients with suicidal ideation three or more times per week. APPROACH: Interviews focused on clinicians' approaches and decision-making processes during suicide risk stratification and treatment planning, including barriers and facilitators. This paper focuses on identified challenges of non-disclosure. Transcripts were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. KEY

resultsClinicians described their experiences with non-disclosure of suicidal ideation among military-affiliated clients, including perspectives on disclosure barriers and communication strategies used to facilitate disclosure. When discussing the challenge of non-disclosure clinicians reported (1) experiencing guardedness and non-disclosure among their clients, and (2) perceiving stigma and fear of negative consequences as disclosure barriers. Based on these experiences, clinicians modified their approaches to suicide risk assessment to facilitate disclosure by (1) normalizing suicidal thoughts and behaviors as safe topics, (2) educating clients to address fears, (3) collaborating with clients to promote acceptance of safe firearm storage, and (4) deliberately using standardized measures to overcome disclosure challenges.

conclusionsProactively implementing communication strategies that address perceived barriers to disclosure of suicidal thoughts and behaviors among military-affiliated psychotherapy clients may facilitate disclosure.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelSuicidal IdeationVeteransAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative Researchdisclosuremental health cliniciansqualitativesuicidal ideationsuicide assessmentVeterans

Identifiers

PMID40437137
PMCPMC12612333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.