ArticleScientific reports2025
Computable phenotypes to identify respiratory viral infections in the All of Us research program.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic health records (EHRs) contain rich temporal data about respiratory viral infections, but methods to identify these infections from EHR data vary widely and lack robust validation. We developed computable phenotypes by integrating virus-specific International Classification of Diseases (ICD) billing codes, prescriptions, and laboratory results within 90-day episodes. Analysis of 265,222 participants with EHR data from the All of Us Research Program yielded national cohorts of varied size: large cohorts for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 28,729) and influenza (n = 19,784); medium cohorts for rhinovirus, human coronavirus, and respiratory syncytial virus (n = 1,161-1,620); and smaller cohorts for the other viruses (n = 238-486). Using laboratory results as a reference standard, phenotypes using virus-specific ICD codes and medications had variable sensitivity (8-67%) but high positive predictive value (PPV, 90-97%) for most viruses, while influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2 phenotypes had lower PPV (69-70%) that improved with the inclusion of additional ICD codes. Identified infections exhibited expected seasonal patterns matching CDC data. This integrated approach identified infections more effectively than individual components alone and demonstrated utility for severe infections in hospital settings. This method enables large-scale studies of host genetics, health disparities, and clinical outcomes across episodic diseases, with flexibility to optimize sensitivity or PPV depending on the specific research question.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.