ArticleScientific reports2025
A fast and lightweight implementation of the Gaussian puff model for near-field atmospheric transport of trace gasses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance Assessment of the Earthview BluBird Continuous Emission Monitoring System for Oil and Gas Facility Emissions Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Review of Source-Term Estimation for Continuous Methane Monitoring: From Data Acquisition to Modeling and Estimation.ACS omega · 2026Review
- A new method of off-site inverse carbon accounting and its application in agriculture carbon measurement.PloS one · 2026Article
- Intercomparison of Three Continuous Monitoring Systems on Operating Oil and Gas Sites.ACS ES&T air · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atmospheric dispersion models are a key component of characterizing methane emissions on oil and gas sites. While some model implementations with varying degrees of complexity are available, existing regulatory-grade dispersion models are cumbersome to apply within an inversion framework on a routine operational level or at scale, and require a gamut of meteorologic information that is typically not available in field operations. Simple Gaussian plume models on the other hand, fail to incorporate changing wind regimes that are routinely observed and prove relevant in practice. Filling this critical need, we provide a computationally efficient and scalable version of the Gaussian puff model with a thresholding algorithm that is two orders of magnitude faster than a naive implementation and only requires readily available meteorological data. Our comparison shows that the Gaussian puff model is higher fidelity and able to capture temporal variation in atmospheric transport better than the commonly used Gaussian plume model. This computationally-efficient and scalable Gaussian puff implementation can be applied to model near-field atmospheric transport in a broad range of applications including the timely call to quickly infer methane emissions from measurements on oil and gas sites for efficient mitigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.