Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40437061›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Temporal context-guided memory capabilities in rodents.

Benjamin J A Slater, Christopher I Petkov, Alexander Easton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin J A SlaterBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. b.j.a.slater2@newcastle.ac.uk.
Christopher I PetkovBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Alexander EastonDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.

Funding

Project 5: ComputationalP50MH109429 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI Robert Thomas Knight · 2017 to 2026
$25.3M
Laminar Circuit Motifs for Working Memory and Language Combinatorics: From Cells to SystemsU01NS137991 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jeremy Greenlee, Christopher I Petkov · 2024 to 2026
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH109429NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS137991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental contexts serve as powerful cues for episodic memory, allowing humans to recall events tied to specific settings. While rats can learn context-specific associations and temporal order, their ability to manage multiple contexts and rapidly adapt to changes in context remains unclear. This study investigated whether rats could order objects across two distinct contexts. Eight Lister Hooded rats were trained in a dual-context maze, where each context contained a pair of objects. In each trial, rats entered the maze, selected an object, and then re-entered either the same or a different context to complete the trial in the correct temporal order. Six rats successfully learned object order within a single context, but only two reached criterion in the more complex two-context condition. Group error analyses revealed a partial reliance on a procedural learning strategy and a tendency to favour one context, where prior location influenced object selection in subsequent trials. While two rats successfully adapted to the two-context condition beyond these simple strategies, most struggled with context switching, exhibiting perseveration difficulties-a trait also observed in some humans. These findings highlight the evolutionary foundations of context-guided memory and reveal remarkable individual variability in the ability to flexibly navigate multiple contexts.

Indexed as

Maze LearningMemoryAnimalsCuesMaleMemory, EpisodicRats

Identifiers

PMID40437061
PMCPMC12119930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.