ArticleScientific reports2025
Event recognition technology and short-term rockburst early warning model based on microseismic monitoring and ensemble learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rockbursts are a significant geological hazard in deep underground engineering, and accurate short-term risk prediction can mitigate safety risks to personnel and equipment. However, challenges remain in the intelligent processing of microseismic(MS) data and effective rockburst prediction. This study focuses on the Dahongshan Copper Mine, utilizing MS monitoring, the synthetic minority oversampling technique and edited nearest neighbours (SMOTE-ENN), and ensemble learning techniques. We developed an intelligent MS event recognition model and a short-term rockburst risk assessment model, enhancing the automation and efficiency of MS event recognition. Additionally, a short-term rockburst risk assessment system (program) was implemented in the Python programming environment, enabling one-click evaluation and warning of short-term rockburst risks (24 h). The research results indicate that the MS event recognition model achieved an F1 score of 0.9819 and an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.9989, with improvements of up to 49.63% and 11.24% compared to the original dataset. The rockburst early warning model V-soft achieves peak accuracy and F1 scores of 0.9394 and 0.9173, respectively, demonstrating performance improvements of 6.59-15.68% in accuracy and 14.11-27.21% in F1 score compared to conventional machine learning algorithms and ensemble classifiers. This highlights its superior discriminative capability and robustness in predicting high-intensity rockburst events. Applying the rockburst risk assessment system to the mine enables one-click intelligent rockburst early warning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.