SynthesisEye (London, England)2025
Non-surgical interventions for proliferative vitreoretinopathy-a systematic review.
Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes of Ocular Toxoplasmosis-Associated Rhegmatogenous and Tractional Retinal Detachment.Journal of vitreoretinal diseases · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic Profiling of the Human Retina Reveals Inflammatory and Metabolic Signatures Associated With Clinical Severity After Retinal Detachment.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Drug strategies for the treatment and prevention of proliferative vitreoretinopathy: an overview of innovative treatment concepts.International ophthalmology · 2026Review
- One-Year Outcome of Vitreous Cortex Remnants Removal Using a Nitinol Flex Loop for Recurrent Retinal Detachment Patients.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- From fibrotic mechanisms to clinical translation: the drug therapy revolution and delivery system breakthrough in proliferative vitreoretinopathy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is the most common cause of surgical failure after retinal detachment (RD) repair, complicating up to 10% of spontaneous RD repairs and 50% of open globe injury-related RD. Early surgical intervention is currently the only intervention that reduces PVR incidence. An effective non-surgical intervention would be valuable in reducing PVR incidence and/or severity, particularly where access to surgery is limited or may be delayed. To define the evidence base for non-surgical management options to prevent and treat Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in retinal detachment and trauma, we searched PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov, Medline and CINAHL for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of non-surgical interventions to prevent or treat established PVR with no restriction on language or start date up until November 2024. All non-surgical interventions were considered with no restrictions. We considered outcomes of post-operative PVR (including retinal reattachment rate) and visual acuity and performed Risk of Bias (RoB) assessments using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. We identified 27 papers which included 1981 patients in studies of primary prevention and 1394 patients in studies of treatment of established PVR. While several studies of various agents individually demonstrated some improvements, the reviewers found concerns with RoB and the results were not replicated in the larger included studies. Multiple studies have investigated non-surgical interventions for PVR after RRD repair and trauma, but none have yet demonstrated clinically significant, repeatable benefits. Improved understanding of PVR pathobiology, along with larger prospective studies of existing preventative strategies may lead to the development of newer and more effective interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.